346
12th. he called upon me and I have now the honour to
submit to you the purport of the situation disclosed and
of the conversation which took place, at which the
Colonial Secretary (Mr. May) was present.
The Self-Government Society
(a term which I understand by the way to be better trans-
-lated by such a phrase as 'Self-Help' or 'Self-Reliance'
and to have nothing to do with the decentralization of the
Goverment of China) appears to have organised a most
effective Boycott, which had already completely destroyed
the Hongkong Manila trade of Messrs. Butterfield and Swire
and there was evidence to shew that it was extending across
the Pacific and to all Chinese Ports. The shipping business
of the Firm was in Mr. Law's opinion threatened with at
any rate temporary ruin. In these circumstances it was in
their interests to come to terms at any price and Mr. Law
was prepared to do so. His object, however, had been to
utilise the surrender by obtaining proof that it was the
Self-Government Society who were demanding the terms, and
responsible for the Boycott. The Viceroy had absolutely
declined to move on the grounds that there was no Boycott
in Canton and that the Boycott,
مم
if any was between Hong-
-kong and Manila. A Chinese Merchant of Amoy now approached
the
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.